Regarding this post regarding the Notices of Intention to Circulate Recall Petitions, a media contact from San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government contacted me with the following information.
I was told that Wendy McCammack and Rikke Van Johnson’s notices of intention have not been filed, but they will be filed shortly.
The identity of the author of the petition is, as I guessed, Pasadena attorney, Michael Lee Allan. Mr. Allan was quoted in one of the Press Enterprise articles about the recall. As noted in the previous post to this one, Michael L. Allan is also the agent for service of process for MICA-PR, Inc., the public relations firm for San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government.
Independent of the recall attempt, Michael Allan’s LinkedIn profile says, in pertinent part:
Mr. Allan is an attorney representing businesses and individuals since 1989. He has practiced in-house with a Fortune 500 company, was general counsel to a Fortune 1000 company, and currently practices privately.
Primary Practice Areas:
BUSINESS LAW, including: Contracts; Intellectual Property; Entity Formation & Counseling; Non-Profit Entities; and Administrative Law;
ESTATES & TRUSTS; Trusts, Wills, Durable Powers of Attorney, and related documentation; probate
* Serving as guest legal commentator for Fox News Channel, also appearing on KTTV 11, Univision Ch. 34, Telemundo Ch. 52, and KWKW radio;
* Serving as general counsel for a $250,000,000 company;
* Drafting and negotiation of multimillion dollar contracts;
* Standardizing corporate contracts for a Fortune 1000 company;
* Assisting standardization of national contracts for a Fortune 500 company;
* Negotiating and Drafting a nationwide lease of telecom facilities;
* Obtaining revisions to state legislative bills with language currently enacted, including pro-business amendments to AB 2449 the “Be a Manager Go to Jail” law and AB 2663 “Wrongful Occupancy of Property;”
* Representing a Fortune 500 company before the California Assembly’s committees regarding Women/Minority Business Enterprises;
* Coordinating private placements;
* “Individual Achievement Award” from corporate client;
* Letter of Commendation for outstanding arbitration skills;
* Letter of Commendation for outstanding general counsel services;
* Commendation from California State Legislature for outstanding public service
Languages: Mr. Allan is conversant in Spanish, and familiar with Italian, German, and French
Admissions: State Bar of California; United States District Court for the Northern and Central Districts of California; United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
BUSINESS LAW: Contracts; Intellectual Property; Business Formation, Counseling & Funding; Non-Profit Entities; Administrative Law; & Legislative
ESTATES & TRUSTS: Trusts, Wills, Durable Powers of Attorney, and related documentation; probate
Political consultant Christopher K. Jones said in comment to the Sun editorial that posted on May 7, 2013: “Maybe if Scott Beard and Larry Sharp had used local residents, instead of private investigators from Los Angeles County, to deliver their recall notices they wouldn’t have so much trouble making a routine service.” I was also told that it was the Michael Allan’s choice to serve the officeholders.
Choice of process server can be a very personal choice for an attorney. When I need to serve someone in another County, I look for someone who has experience in that area. For example, when I need to serve an out-of-state corporation in Sacramento, there is one Sacramento process serving firm that I use. I can imagine that Michael Allan has a Los Angeles firm that he likes to use since he is from Los Angeles County. However, in a political process such as this, the Charter does not require that a process server be used at all. It is my understanding in the earlier attempt, Tim Prince served Chas Kelley with his Notice of Intention personally.