Monthly Archives: September 2013

    Officially, San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government claims to be neutral on the candidate to replace City Attorney James F. Penman, should voters vote to recall Jim Penman on the recall question on the November 5, 2013 ballot.  San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government is the PAC behind the San Bernardino Recall on the November 5, 2013 ballot.

    San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government public relations consultant Michael McKinney is quoted as saying:

    “We’re pleased that there have been candidates that have come forward out of the community that are running in this historic chance to have seven of the nine office-holders on the ballot,” said Michael McKinney, manager of the recall campaign, referring to the candidates facing recall plus those already up for election that day. “The recall committee itself will be in the field supporting the recall, urging voters to vote yes, but it’s not allowed under its organization to help any of the candidates.”  The Sun, Ryan Hagen, “Eight candidates qualify for San Bernardino Recall Election, posted 9/6/2013 6:40 PM PDT.

    The San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government’s website, as of the writing of this post, does not have any information supporting any specific replacement candidates.

    However, on Twitter, Michael McKinney, slams both City Attorney James F. Penman, and replacement candidate Tim Prince in response to a tweet from Ryan Hagen regarding Gary Saenz:

    1. @SBcityNOW very hypocritical of Penman to throw stones while living in a glass house given the active FPPC investigation.

    2. @MICAPRGA I wasn’t familiar with this investigation until now. Was complaint made by SBRFRG?

    3. @SBcityNOW personal complaint filed 28 May 2013 FPPC file no 13/341. Investigation confirmed 16 August 2013.

    4. @MICAPRGA I’ll get the details tomorrow. Thanks for the heads-up.

    @SBcityNOW along the lines of glass houses. 2008 Congressional candidate’s online bio. pic.twitter.com/JdMQ73RHfn

    2:47 PM – 13 Sep 13

    Image will appear as a link
    1. .@MICAPRGA Interesting. @IEPrince, didn’t you say you understood this to be forbidden?

    2. @SBcityNOW The title is proper in a resume as long as it is not used in a book issued for sale (published). The 2007 excerpt complied.

    3. @SBcityNOW Numerous local attorneys including Penman’s longtime outside contract attorney Joseph Arias http://ariaslockwood.com/joseph-arias  use the term.

    4. @IEPrince I see that Arias does list it; perhaps it is common. Context perhaps different on something intended for legal audience?

    5. @IEPrince “public” still seems to be what “intended for publication” means. Why prohibit using it in resume sold as a book?

    6. @SBcityNOW Use of the title in resumes is acceptable as long as it is not intended to sell books (implying the author is a judge).

    7. @IEPrince hmm, I see. I’ll get your perspective in more detail Monday, but thanks for responding.

     Now, perhaps Michael McKinney is acting on his own, but it is curious that someone who is presumably paid by San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government is slamming Tim Prince.  According to Michael McKinney, as cited above,  “but it’s  not allowed under its [San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government] organization to help any of the candidates.”
    Considering there are only two replacement candidates running should the recall of San Bernardino City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman be successful,  the public relations consultant for San Beranrdino Residents for Responsible Government is defending one candidate (Gary Saenz) while slamming the other replacement candidate (Tim Prince).
    Michael McKinney’s statement that San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government is not allowed to help any of its candidates does not correspond with what their website says:

    What happens next?

    The City needs new and vibrant leadership. San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government encourages qualified replacement candidates to run for office. This committee will support the Recall initiative and may become involved in recruiting and supporting candidates after the petition phase of the campaign.  San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government, FAQs, http://www.sanbernardinorecall.org/faqs/ accessed September 20, 2013 11:18 a.m. PDT.

    Therefore, it can be deduced that San Bernardino Residents for Responsible Government is not only supporting the recall of City Attorney James F. Penman, but also supports recall replacement candidate Gary Saenz over Tim Prince.

    In my last post, I described that I did not know much about Gary Saenz, the San Bernardino Attorney running in the recall election on November 5, 2013 in San Bernardino.  In order for Gary Saenz to be elected to fill out the remaining term of City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, first voters, by a majority, must vote to recall City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, Gary Saenz must get more votes then San Bernardino Attorney Tim Prince, and Gary Saenz must qualify for the position after his election.

    At this point, September 19, 2013, at 10:33 a.m., I have not found a campaign website for Gary Saenz.

    By searching the membership records at the State Bar of California online, I found this information:

    Gary David Sanez, State Bar Number 79539, is an active member of the State Bar of California, admitted on April 28, 1978 and active from that date on.  His undergraduate school was San Diego State University, San Diego, California, and his law school was University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Law.  He has no public record of discipline, and no public record of administrative actions.

    The top result in Google for his law firm is a Facebook result. There are other similar social media sites that are largely devoid of information except for an address and a phone number.  The address of his law firm near 1oth Street and D Street, when run through the Tax Collector’s website, states that Gary Saenz owns the property as a tenant in common, with Ronald Saenz and Robert Saenz.

    This Likedin profile states that Gary Saenz is an attorney at Saenz Realty.

    What about the local media, what do they have to say about Gary Saenz?

    In a post dated September 6, 2013 at 6:40 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, Ryan Hagen of the Sun posted an article named”Eight candidates qualify for San Bernardino recall election.” The article provides the following information regarding Gary D. Saenz:

    “I see a tremendous need for a competent attorney to run as the city attorney,” Saenz said. “I see a need for an attorney whose intentions are to do just that: to be an attorney for the city and not to be a politician.”

    Saenz has experience primarily in real estate law, although some cases have involved representing individuals in bankruptcy court. He said the city should hire outside attorneys who specialize in certain areas — as the city has already done with its bankruptcy case.

    “What a good manager does is rely upon other people who are skilled in administering an office, for example, and who are knowledgeable in areas where I am not as knowledgeable, such as public law,” he said. “It would be my intention to have the right staff person or contract attorney, and make sure everything that crosses the desk is a good fit for the city of San Bernardino.”

    Saenz has lived and practiced law in the city for more than 30 years and has volunteered as a library trustee, Equal Opportunity Employment Commission and other charitable organizations as well as a judge pro-tem for San Bernardino County Courts, according to his ballot statement.

    The next online information about Gary Saenz is included in an article posted on September 16, 2013 at 5:09 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, written by Ryan Hagen of the Sun, named “San Bernardino city attorney candidate Tim Prince called hypocritical

    The article has the following to say about Gary Saenz:

    By contrast, a 2007 policy by San Bernardino Superior Court Judge Larry Allen based on state ethics rules specifically prohibits using the term on a candidate statement that is mailed to voters, as Gary Saenz did until instructed to change it by City Clerk Gigi Hanna.

    . . .

    Saenz maintained that using the term was a technicality that should have no bearing on voters.

    “I have to maintain that this is simply not a pertinent issue to this election,” he said in an email. “It wasn’t an issue when it related to me, and I don’t feel any differently now that it involves Mr. Prince.”

    The change to Saenz’s candidate statement was one of four requested by elections officials, including a change to Prince’s statement.

    That story was in response to a story posted on September 12, 2013 at 5:59 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time by Ryan Hagen of The Sun, “San Bernardino city attorney candidate revises statement,” Gary Saenz is quoted:

    “To say this is a trivial matter is an understatement,” Saenz said in an email. “No one expects an attorney to keep up on laws about judges, especially when one is no longer a judge. But that doesn’t stop my opponents looking for minutia to try and create a political issue.”

    . . .

    By Ryan Hagen, The Sun

    Posted: |

    SAN BERNARDINO >> A candidate for city attorney was forced to change the statement that will be sent to voters in the recall election after the current city attorney pointed out that Gary D. Saenz was not allowed to say that for more than 10 years he had served as “judge-pro-tem.”

    Use of that title — or “temporary judge” as they’re now known — in political ballot statements is specifically forbidden on a two-page policy on temporary judges that San Bernardino Superior Court Judge Larry Allen sent to all temporary judges in 2007.

    That was several years after Saenz, who is primarily a real estate attorney, says he stopped being a judge pro tem.

    “To say this is a trivial matter is an understatement,” Saenz said in an email. “No one expects an attorney to keep up on laws about judges, especially when one is no longer a judge. But that doesn’t stop my opponents looking for minutia to try and create a political issue.”

    According to emails, Penman informed the city clerk’s office that the term was not allowed and City Clerk Gigi Hanna on Wednesday asked Saenz to remove it from his candidate statement. Saenz sent a revised statement — the same as his previous 11-sentence statement but without the sentence mentioning he had been judge pro tem — later that day.

    Saenz has said he would use deputies or contract attorneys to offer advice on specialized areas of law with which he was not familiar, and said this incident shows why a non-politician should hold the office.

    “It is politics as usual from a seat in City Hall that simply should not be political,” he said. “It is exactly why I am running – to remove the political gamesmanship from the City Attorney office.”

    I do not have access to the Sun’s archives, but Gary Saenz is mentioned in the following stories:

    The Sun, September 14, 2003, Alan Schnepf,  “Ex-Waitresses order a reunion” about Nena’s in San Bernardino,

    The Sun, April 15, 2005, David Schwartz,  “Library board looking for book budget funds” where Gary Saenz is quoted as the San Bernardino Public Library Board Vice President.

    The Sun, June 5, 2008, Robert Rogers”A symbol of possibility,” a story about Robert F. Kennedy’s visit to San Bernardino on May 29, 1968, which states in part that “When RFK visited San Bernardino on May 29, a then-16-year old Eisenhower High School student named Gary Saenz tailed the campaign, taking photos . . .”

    The Sun, February 19, 2005, David Schwartz, “Proud to be on A-list” regarding restaurant inspections, Gary Saenz is quoted.

    From public records available on the Internet, he was born in San Bernardino County in 1951.  He lives and owns a home in the 7th Ward of San Bernardino, and has lived at his present home since the mid-1990s.

    From the City’s website, he was appointed to the Library Board of Trustees by Mayor Judith Valles, and approved by the Mayor and Common Council at the January 24, 2000 meeting.  Council Member Frank Schnetz made the motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and the motion was unanimously carried.

    In the back-up for that meeting, Gary Saenz gave some autobiographical information.  He has lived in San Bernardino since 1951. In 2000, he was a member of the First Presbyterian Chuch of San Bernardino, a Member of the Board of Directors of the Home of Neighborly Service, and a Parkside Elementary School Council Member.  He graduated from Eisenhower High School in Rialto in 1969, San Diego State University with a BA in 1974, and the UCLA School of Law with a Juris Doctorate in 1977.

    Gary Saenz further stated in the application that he has been an attorney since 1978, a self-employed attorney since 1983, a “U.S. Fed. Govt. Fee Attorney for VA since 1986 – present”, a licensed California Real Estate Broker, and a “Judge Pro Tem S.B. County Courts.”

    Gary Saenz made a public comment in the Mayor and Common Council Meeting of August 4, 2000 regarding a proposed charter change (what would become Measure M on the November 2000 ballot).  The minutes, back before action minutes, stated that Gary Saenz “expressed his concerns and opposition to [proposed Charter] Section 1401, specifically the language which provides that any person appointed to the Board of Library Trustees may be removed by the affirmative vote of at least five members of the Common Council, except for purposes of censorship.”

    Gary Saenz was reappointed to the Board of Library Trustees on the September 9, 2002 Mayor and Common Council Agenda.  However, according to the September 23, 2002 minutes, the reappointment was rescinded “due to subsequent clarification showing that MR. Saenz has two years remaining on his current term.”  That vote was seven to zero, Common Council Members Esther Estrada, Susan Lien, Gordon McGinnis, Neil Derry, Joe Surarez, Betty Dean Anderson and Wendy McCammack voting aye.

    According to the current list of the Library Board of Trustees, Gary Saenz is not currently a library commissioner.

    The agenda backup for the December 20, 2004 meeting stated that Gary Saenz’s then-present Board of Library Trustees was from May 2002 to May 2006.  The agenda backup from December 18, 2006 said that Gary Saenz’s term was from May 2006 to May 2010.

    From the State of California Bureau of Real Estate database, it gives the following information on Gary David Saenz.  His mailing address is the same as for the State Bar.  He is a Broker, his license ID is 00884293, and his Broker’s license expires on March 26, 2017.  His Broker license was issued on 3/29/1985 (taken from secondary records), and he has no former names, no current DBAs, no current branches, no current affiliated corporations, no disciplinary actions, an no other public comments.

    Searching the City Clerk’s Business Registration form, which is very difficult to use, I found two current City Business Licenses for Gary D. Saenz

    Business Name Business Address Owner Name Business Phone Expiration Date STATUS
    GARY D SAENZ 1010 N D ST GARY D SAENZ (909)388-8727 10/31/2013 Active

    and

    Business Name Business Address Owner Name Business Phone Expiration Date STATUS
    GARY D SAENZ, REAL ESTATE BROKER 1002 N D ST GARY D SAENZ (909)889-2668 03/31/2014 Active

    As far as Saenz Realty, Inc., (you can see a “Saenz Realty” sign on Google Street view at 1002 N D Street), the agent for service of process is Ronald Saenz, not Gary Saenz.  I could find no other information other than on LinkedIn regarding Gary Saenz’s involvement with Saenz Realty. Corportion Wiki, which I would not deem reliable, says that Ronald Saenz is the president of Saenz Realty, Inc.

    That is the sum total of information that I could find on City Attorney replacement candidate Gary Saenz, beyond some civil court cases which are not interesting or relevant.  The search of the online permit manager at the City’s website was unremarkable, and the database has some issues.

    I am not going to tell you how to vote; this site is neutral.

    However, if you already have an opinion about the Office of City Attorney, or the existing candidates, I am going to run through a few scenarios.

    As my reader(s) know, I worked for the City of San Bernardino as a Deputy City Attorney from February 2001 to January 2006. I first met the current City Attorney of the City of San Bernardino, James F. “Jim” Penman somewhere between 1988 and 1990 at the home of the late attorney Richard R Beswick.  I first met recall candidate Timothy “Tim” Prince in 1999 while either volunteering or working at Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino, Inc.  Though I have worked as an attorney in San Bernardino since 1998, I have never met recall candidate Gary Saenz, nor had any legal work associated with recall candidate Gary Saenz. I have heard the name before, but I do not know Gary Saenz, nor do I know his reputation.  At all.

    I have checked the Internet today, and as far as I can tell, there is no website for the incumbent City Attorney, James F. “Jim” Penman, and as far as I can tell, that includes Twitter, email and Facebook.  I do not know the strategy of City Attorney Penman in defeating the recall.  I have not been directly contacted by City Attorney Penman regarding the recall in any capacity.

    Similarly, I have not seen City Attorney recall candidate Timothy Prince in person, I believe, this year.  We have not discussed the recall.  I do not think we have discussed City politics since the 2011 election at the second City Attorney debate at Arrowhead Country Club.  While he invited me to his congressional announcement in Mentone when he ran against Jerry Lewis, I do not believe that I have ever been invited to any other Tim Prince election event.

    The State Bar gives the following information about Mr. Prince, City Attorney Penman and Mr. Saenz:

    Gary David Sanez, State Bar Number 79539, is an active member of the State Bar of California, admitted on April 28, 1978 and active from that date on.  His undergraduate school was San Diego State University, San Diego, California, and his law school was University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Law.  He has no public record of discipline, and no public record of administrative actions.

    City Attorney James Frank Penman, State Bar Number 91761, is an active member of the State Bar of California, admitted on May 30, 1980, and active from that date forward. His undergraduate school was California State University, San Bernardino, and his law school was Western State University College of Law. He has no public record of discipline, and no public record of administrative actions.

    Timothy Peter Prince, State Bar Number 151245, is an active member of the State Bar of California, admitted on December 11, 1990, and active from that date on.  His undergraduate school was the University of California (Berkeley), and his law school was University of California Hastings College of Law in San Francisco. He has no public record of discipline, and no public record of administrative actions.

    The recall is a procedure under the Charter of the City of San Bernardino. In this case, sufficient numbers of registered voters city-wide signed recall petitions to put the recall measure on the November 5, 2013 ballot, which is also a Primary Municipal Election for San Bernardino.  San Bernardino City Charter Section 122 gives the following information about what is on the ballot:

    The ballots used when voting upon said proposed recall shall contain the
    words “shall (title of office and the name of the person against whom the recall is
    filed) be recalled?” and the words “yes” and “no.”

    I have seen neither the ballot nor the sample ballot, but it should read “Shall City Attorney James F. Penman be recalled?”

    Voters then have the option of voting yes or no by drawing a line to complete the arrow next to their choice.

    Next, Charter section 122 states:

    Qualified candidates to succeed the person against whom the recall is filed,
    shall be listed on the ballot, except that the incumbent shall not be eligible to
    succeed himself/herself in any such recall election.
    In any such removal election, if a majority of the votes cast is for “yes” on
    the question of whether or not the incumbent should be recalled, the candidate
    receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected. The incumbent
    shall thereupon be deemed removed from the office upon qualification of his/her
    successor. In case the party who received the highest number of votes should fail
    to qualify within ten (10) days after receiving notification of election, the office shall
    be deemed vacant. The successor of any officer so removed shall hold office
    during the unexpired term of his/her predecessor.

    In this election, two candidates have qualified, Gary D. Saenz and Tim Prince. From the language of the Charter, there does not appear to be any ability to write-in a candidate. Should the majority of votes (that is, fifty percent plus one) be to remove City Attorney James F. Penman, then the person who has the highest amount of votes between Gary D. Saenz and Tim Prince will be the winner.  If there is a tie, then the tie-breaking rules of the Election Code would probably prevail.  If neither of Gary D. Saenz nor Tim Prince failed to qualify within ten days after election, then the office would be vacant and would be filled according to the Charter.  Examples of failing to qualify is if City Attorney James F. Penman were recalled, and if either Gary Saenz or Tim Prince had more votes, but moved out of San Bernardino, or lost his license to practice law, he would fail to qualify.

    So, how should you vote in the recall election for City Attorney?

    IF YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. PENMAN

    If you are satisfied with the performance of City Attorney James F. Penman, or in the alternative, if you are supportive of Jim Penman as a leader, you support Jim Penman’s world view, policy choices, approaches, you should vote “No” on the issue of the recall.

    IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. “JIM” PENMAN, BUT DO NOT LIKE RECALLS, OR DO NOT LIKE THIS RECALL

    If you are not satisfied or dissatisfied by City Attorney Jim Penman’s performance, but you do not like the concept of recalls, then you should vote “No” on the issue of the recall.

    IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. “JIM” PENMAN, HAVE NO ISSUES WITH RECALLS, BUT DO NOT LIKE THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT CANDIDATES

    If you are not satisfied or dissatisfied by City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, have no issues with the concept of a recall, but do not want either Tim Prince or Gary Saenz to be the elected City Attorney for the City of San Bernardino until the next election in 2015, then you should vote “No” on the issue of the recall.

    IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. “JIM” PENMAN, HAVE NO ISSUES WITH RECALLS, BUT LIKE TIM PRINCE, BUT NOT GARY SAENZ

    If you are dissatisfied or not satisfied with the performance of City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, or you don’t like him personally, or his policies, or his staff, or you don’t like how he handled a particular matter, or you just want to punish him, and you like Tim Prince, but you don’t like Gary Saenz, then you should vote “Yes” on the issue of the recall, and for Tim Prince. You can only vote for one replacement candidate, and if you mark both Tim Prince and Gary Saenz, you will invalidate your ballot.

    IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. “JIM” PENMAN, HAVE NO ISSUES WITH RECALLS, BUT LIKE GARY SAENZ, BUT NOT TIM PRINCE

    If you are dissatisfied or not satisfied with the performance of City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, or you don’t like him personally, or his policies, or his staff, or you don’t like how he handled a particular matter, or you just want to punish him, and you like Gary Saenz, but you don’t like Tim Prince, then you should vote “Yes” on the issue of the recall, and for Gary Saenz. You can only vote for one replacement candidate, and if you mark both Tim Prince and Gary Saenz, you will invalidate your ballot.

    IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. “JIM” PENMAN, HAVE NO ISSUES WITH RECALLS, BUT CANNOT CHOSE A REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE, OR DISLIKE BOTH GARY SAENZ AND TIMOTHY PRINCE

    If you are dissatisfied or not satisfied with the performance of City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman, or you don’t like him personally, or his policies, or his staff, or you don’t like how he handled a particular matter, or you just want to punish him, but you cannot pick a replacement candidate, then you should vote “Yes” on the issue of the recall, and you should either pick the what in your mind is the lesser of two evils between Gary Saenz and Tim Prince, OR you can undervote the replacement candidate portion of the ballot.  That is, you pick neither Tim Prince nor Gary Saenz.  Then you can say that you voted to recall City Attorney James F. Penman, but that you are not responsible for electing either Tim Prince or Gary Saenz.  As long as they qualify, one of them has to win, as long as they get one more vote then the other.

    IF YOU VOTED NO ON THE RECALL OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. PENMAN, AND LIKE NEITHER OF THE RECALL CANDIDATES

    This is trickier.  If, despite your no vote on the recall, City Attorney Jim Penman is recalled, it is almost mathematically certain that one of the two replacement candidates will be the next City Attorney of the City of San Bernardino.  The only thing stopping them is if neither of them gets a vote (which is unlikely, because they would likely vote for themselves) or neither qualifies after being elected (which is unlikely). As far as I can tell, any write-in vote will not qualify and will not be counted, and there is always the possibility that it will invalidate your ballot. However, perhaps as a protest vote, someone could write-in a name, that would only come to light if there was an election challenge, like in the Minnesota Senate race where someone wrote in a vote for the Lizard People while simultaneously voting for Al Franken. The other option is to undervote, and then claim that the total number of people voting on the recall question does not equal the amount of votes for the replacement candidates, thus showing that their election was not legitimate, in order to challenge the replacement candidate before the next regular primary election, and in the next regular primary election. If you like to get into arguments on the Internet, this may be the choice for you.

    IF YOU VOTED YES ON THE RECALL OF CITY ATTORNEY JAMES F. PENMAN, AND LIKE NEITHER OF THE RECALL CANDIDATES

    Not as tricky.  You can undervote as described above as a protest (non-)vote.  You can use random chance to pick either Tim Prince or Gary Saenz.  You can possibly invalidate your ballot with a write-in that won’t be counted.

    ANY OTHER OPTIONS?

    You can undervote both the recall and the replacement.  You can vote just for a replacement and undervote the recall.  You can not vote at all so as not to dilute the votes of informed voters.  Ultimately, you alone must chose your path. Even though you have strong opinions as stated above, you can vote against your own interests.  You can vote based on national partisan issues in this non-partisan local election.  You can vote only on this recall issue, and no other issues on the November 5, 2013 ballot.  The choice is yours.

    I received this email from the Anthony Jones campaign:

     

    Anthony Jones campaign reception/endorsement announcement.

    Thursday, September 19, 2013

    5:30pm – 8:30pm

    Century 21 Showcase

    7835 Church Street, Highland CA 92346

    Hors D’oeuvres and hosted bar will be available

    Presented by:

    Century 21 Showcase

    Mike Stoffel

    San Bernardino Police Officers Association

    Paul Herrera

    For more information or  RSVP to Dolores (909) 214-6274

    Paid for by Anthony Jones for City Council 2013

    28097 Bradley Road, Menifee,  CA  92586

    FPPC# 1359119

    www.voteanthonyjones.com

    Anthony Jones
    Century 21 Showcase
    909.246.3010

     

    As promised, I’ll publish anything that is sent to me, or mailed to me, unless it is sent to me privately and not intended to be published.  I can only imagine that this means that SBPOA is endorsing Anthony Jones for 4th Ward.

    The City Clerk’s online records now has a “Requested” folder, which I can only guess means documents requested as a California Public Records Act request, which are then put in the Requested folder for the requester, and then anyone else who wants to see it can be referred to the folder.  The folder has the Form 460 for the Recall proponents, the campaign filings of Council members Chas Kelley and Robert Jenkins.  There are three bankruptcy-related resolutions related to the City’s bankruptcy outside council.

    The City Clerk’s Office had a useful Elections 2013 folder that was taken down by the City Clerk’s Office.