Ralph Prince

    So far nothing has been written on City Attorney James F. “Jim” Penman’s Recall Election campaign, beyond this post.  I strive to remain neutral in these elections; however, I have some observations.

    I have not seen any signs in San Bernardino.  I have not received official campaign literature.  I have not received a fundraising letter from the campaign itself.  I have been informed that there is an October 2nd 2013 fundraiser against the recall.  The flier for the fundraiser has a campaign style sign in the upper right hand corner that says “San Bernardino is Not For Sale NO Recall.

    According to the flier, the fundraiser is cosponsored by former Mayors Judith Valles, Evlyn Wilcox, and Dr. Barbara Flores. Also according to the flier, the honorary co-sponsors are Retired Superior Court Judges Paul Bryant, Stanley W. Hodge, Craig Kamansky, John Martin, and John Wade. The flier says that more honorary co-sponsors are attorneys Joe Arias, Rene Jacober, George Theios, Bradley White, and the law firm of Gresham, Savage, Nolan and Tilden.  More co-sponsors, according to the flier are Sharon Gaitan-Blechinger of the Mexico Cafe, Robert Gastel of Arrowhead Mechanical, Jack Katzman, ABO, Inc., George Kritikos, George’s Burgers, and Jeremy LeClair of The Mug Restaurant. The flier says that it is a partial list.

    In the 2011 election, I said:

    When I was a Deputy City Attorney for the City of San Bernardino, I learned a thing or two about San Bernardino politics.   One was that you shouldn’t bother spending money before Labor Day for a November election.  The second thing I learned is that with more voters using vote by mail (what used to be called absentee voting), candidates have to send direct mail earlier, and last minute hit pieces don’t work as well as they used to do.  Typically, a candidate will send a positive mailer first, particularly if they are not well-known.

    What surprises me now, if there is such a thing left as surprise in modern San Bernardino politics, is that I have not received any mail from City Attorney James F. Penman in this cycle.  The first ballots should arrive in in the second week in October.  I do not recall that there was a working James F. Penman website in the 2011 race.  There is not one now, but I would argue that electronic campaign presence is more important now than in the past.  If you look at the 2011-2012 San Bernardino City Clerk’s race, which was so close, a modern campaign must use all electronic means to contact supporters and voters.

    History shows that City Attorney James F. Penman’s  election margins and votes have gone down since 1995.  That can be attributed to a number factors, including changing of demographics, with some of City Attorney James F. Penman’s core supporters either leaving the City, leaving the area, and sometimes ceasing to exist, either by changing from a supporter to an opponent, or shall we euphemistically say, “pining for the fjords.

    What is the support for the assertion that City Attorney Jim Penman is losing support?

    Here are the results by election:

    19870307 Primary Municipal Election James Frank “Jim” Penman  No data
    Ralph H. Prince  No Data
    19910305 Primary Municipal Election James Frank “Jim” Penman  No Data
    19951107 Primary Municipal Election Jim Penman 9305 72.82 SB Clerk
    Stan Tomlinson 3472 27.17 13,893 ballots cast, 77,185 registered voters
    No Vote Recorded 1116 Not included
    19991102 Primary Municipal Election James Frank “Jim” Penman 7560 100 SBROV
    20031104 Primary Municipal Election Jim Penman 7,999 96.11 SBROV
    Write-In 324 3.89
    20071106 Primary Municipal Election James Frank “Jim” Penman 7,001 51.46 SBROV
    Marianne Milligan 6,557 48.2
    Write-In 47 0.35
    20111108 Primary Municipal Election James Frank “Jim” Penman 6,447 51.72 ROV/Clerk
    David L. McKenna 6,019 48.28
    No Vote Recorded 489 Not included 12,955 ballots cast

    What does this data mean? Though the population has increased from 1990 (164,164) to now (2012 estimate: 213,295), an increase of thirty percent, Jim Penman’s votes have fallen about 30 percent.

    These numbers should be alarming to City Attorney James F. Penman’s campaign.  The 2011 numbers should also be alarming to Jim Penman’s campaign.  The 489 undervotes, spoiled ballots, or unrecognized write-ins had a potential of changing the election.  Again, the 2011-2012 City Clerk elections shows every vote counts.

    Even more alarming are the reported number of valid recall signatures.  Though a signature is not a vote, as there are multiple barriers to voting versus signing a petition, and even though there were allegations of signature fraud, the reported number of valid signatures is 11,855, just over the required 15 percent of registered voters at the time of the circulation of the petition:

    There were 11,855 valid signatures to recall Penman, out of 77,254 registered voters, according to Hanna. That’s 15.3 percent, just over the 15 percent threshold to put a city-wide office on the ballot for a recall.  The Sun, Ryan Hagen, “Penman, two council members to be on San Bernardino recall ballot,” posted at sbsun.com .

    The Certificate of Sufficiency of Recall Petition of City Attorney is attached to Resolution 2013-259 passed 5-0-2 at the September 3, 2013 Mayor and Common Council Meeting . The Certificate states that 11,588 valid signatures to qualify, which is shown as 15 percent of 77,254 registered voters. 18,070 signatures were submitted, 18,070 were verified, of which 11,855 were found valid, and 6,215 were found invalid.

    It can and has been said that 59,184 voters did not validly sign a recall petition, and that the recall only had 267 more valid signatures over the minimum.  However, in the November 8, 2011 election, only 12,955 ballots were cast in total.  11,588 valid signatures were found by the City Clerk.  Even if Mr. Penman equals the number of votes (6,447) he received in that election, there are still 5,141 more signatures to recall Mr. Penman in 2013 than votes for Mr. Penman in 2011.

    Recalls are sufficiently rare in San Bernardino that voters may need to be educated on how to vote.  The Penman campaign must educate voters that they must vote “No” to retain James F. Penman.  That can be confusing to some voters.  However, that information is to my knowledge not available to voters.

    It has been argued that the replacement candidates are not sufficiently attractive to motive voters to the polls.  However, this is not a single-issue election, and the number of races exceeds the 2011 Primary Municipal Election. Further, there were huge negatives to the last two challengers.  The two replacement candidates are both longtime San Bernardino residents, if nothing else. It would be a mistake to underestimate the replacement candidates.

    Should City Attorney James F. Penman wish to finish the term to which he was elected in November 8, 2011, he should be concerned about the decline in votes, the number of valid petitions.  The first ballots will be in the hands of voters in a few weeks, the election will be over in about a month and half. No doubt he is sufficiently concerned, however, we have not seen that concern translate into outreach, including traditional walking precincts, campaign mail, or new media.

     

    John Quimby was born on February 12, 1935 in Prescott, Arizona, and died on December 22, 2012 in Carmichael, California.

    According to his obits, he was elected to the San Bernardino City Council at the age of 22, however, the records that I have seen is that he was 24.   On March 17, 1959, he came in the top two in the San Bernardino Municipal Primary Election for the 3rd Ward Council seat.  In the primary, the vote was 686 votes for Roxie Garrison, and 640 for John P. Quimby. The other primary candidates were Chester F. Baxter (514 votes), James T. Marsh (137 votes), and Gabriel B. Orona (392 votes).  However, on April 14, 1959, in the General Municipal Election, he beat Mrs. Roxie Garrison by 1709 votes to 920 votes.  To put into perspective about how ancient that history was in modern San Bernardino politics, 1959 was the first time Ralph H. Prince was elected City Attorney, and Al Ballard wouldn’t be elected Mayor for another six years.

    According to this article, it was his time on the City Council that informed his signature legislative achievement, the Quimby Act:

    John Quimby, a former Democratic Assemblyman from San Bernardino, said he authored the law because he was a city councilman in the 1960s and saw firsthand the need for parks.

    “We couldn’t get the goddamned developers to budge an inch” on dedicating land for public use, including putting in sidewalks, he said.  OC Park History Is a Tale of Two Counties, Voice of OC, by Tracy Wood, Posted June 13, 2011, updated January 2, 2013, accessed at http://www.voiceofoc.org/countywide/county_government/article_db467438-956e-11e0-8e8d-001cc4c002e0.html on January 7, 2013.

    Other than that, all that I could gather is that he was probably sworn in May 1959 (he voted for Ordinance 2259 on May 18, 1959, but not Ordinance 2258 on April 28, 1959).  After the November 6, 1962 General Election, he was absent for the vote on Ordinance 2468 on November 19, 1962, and by the adjourned regular meeting of November 26, 1962, Jesse Arias Jr. had been appointed 3rd Ward council member.

    He was elected in November 6, 1962 in the General Election in the 72nd Assembly District.  Quimby, the Democrat, received 61.2 percent of the vote, to Clayton “Stan” Stanhope’s 38.8 percent. Stanhope was listed by the LA Times as being a teacher from Montclair, and Quimby as a radio engineer (announcer) and city councilman from San Bernardino.  By 1963, the Los Angeles Times refers to his home city as Rialto, though it sometimes said San Bernardino in later years.  Quimby won again on November 3, 1964, with 59.9 percent of the vote to the Republican James L. “Jim” Christensen, 40.1 percent of the vote. Quimby was reelected.  On November 8, 1966, Quimby received 58.7 percent of the vote, and the Republican candidate, Harry S. Drake of Upland received 41.3 percent of the vote.  John Quimby received 58.3 percent of the vote in the 72nd Assembly District to James L. “Jim” Christensen (then an Upland City Councilman) on November 5, 1968.  On November 3, 1970, Quimby trounced Republican Peter S. “Pete” Neigel, 70.6 to 29.4 percent.  He ran again on November 7, 1972, and received 57.4 percent of the vote to Republican Timothy M. Dolan’s 42.5 percent, and Paul Bocanegra’s .1 percent for the La Raza Party.  He was primaried in 1974, by two other candidates, including the eventual winner Richard H. Robinson.

    In 1971, Quimby authored a special bill that would give Al Ballard, the former Mayor, a special higher pension related to his fire service.  I’m not sure how it came out, but the City Council opposed it.